![]() It supports drag and drop of files and folders. These algorithms are slow for passwords and collisions. The program allows you to generate the hashes with the chosen algorithm (MD2, MD5, SHA -1, SHA - 256, SHA -384 and SHA -512) of a single file or an entire folder (you can choose to scan the folder recursively or not recursively). For example, Password1 is vastly more likely to be somebody's password than act chance past language ( generated using the XKCD comic method), which is in turn vastly more likely than ![]() Meaning that out of the set of all possible inputs to the hash function, a relative few of them are vastly more likely to be somebody's password than others. Yes, SHA-256 would be secure for that, likely more secure than when SuperGenPass uses. No, actually, the answer is related to the fact that passwords are, in general, predictable. 1 I think you are describing the approach used by SuperGenPass: Take a master password (same for every site), concatenate it with the site's domain name, and then hash the thing. ![]() I suspect the answer is related to the fact that passwords are, in general, small.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |